Iowa Public Television


Farmers Rally To Improve Western Water Infrastructure

posted on January 25, 2013

<p><strong>Note:</strong> If this video does not play, you may need to download the free <a href="">Flash</a> video plugin for your web browser.</p> <p><a href="" target="_blank"><img alt="Get Adobe Flash Player" src="graphics/plugins/get_flash_player.gif" border="0" height="31" width="88"></a></p>

An Israeli scientist, credited with developing irrigation systems that conserve water allowing food to be grown in some of the world's driest climates, was awarded the World Food Prize in October. 

Daniel Hillel’s micro-irrigation methods, have revolutionized agricultural practices in more than 30 countries over the past 50 to 60 years

Commenting on Hillel’s selection last spring, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, spoke of the importance of getting the most out of every drop of water. Especially in many regions of the world where the precious resource is too unpredictable to sustain an American style of agriculture.

In California, where agriculture has an annual economic impact of nearly $40 billion, farmers depend heavily on water traveling hundreds of miles to irrigate crops. But as David Miller discovered last summer, too many people vying for too little water is resulting in big problems in "The Nation's Salad Bowl".

Every year, approximately 7.4 million acre feet of water, about 2.4 trillion gallons, flows from the Sierra Nevada Mountains through various canals and waterways into California’s Central Valley. While some is diverted to urban areas, nearly 70 percent gives life to fruits and vegetables that eventually make it to tables across the United States.

Farmers in the Central Valley, a region 40 miles wide and more than 400 miles long, rely on the constant flow of water to make a living but in 2009, the mountain snowpack was 60 percent below normal. As water levels fell, provisions in the Federal Endangered Species Act were set in motion to protect native salmon and delta smelt. Water from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta was restricted and fewer acres were planted in the San Joaquin Valley below. Thousands of agricultural workers lost their jobs and unemployment soared over 40 percent in some communities. Growers across the Central Valley lost billions in revenue all in hopes of saving the three-inch long delta smelt.

Joe Del Bosque, Empresas Del Bosque: “…I see a law that was well intended to help - help the ecosystems and that is fine.  But the Endangered Species Act has no consideration for human impact.  So if it puts me out of business to save the Delta smelt, the Endangered Species Act doesn't care.  It only wants to save the species at any cost.  And there is something wrong with that.”

Joe Del Bosque is a second generation farmer from Firebaugh, California in the San Joaquin Valley. Del Bosque idled more than a third of his 2,200 acres during the drought, diverting precious water from vine-ripened fruits and vegetables to his fruit and nut trees.

Joe Del Bosque, Empresas Del Bosque: “We have had those cut backs for - for 20 years here in agriculture.  So we understand them and we've kind of learned to roll with the punches.  It is not easy when - if we had 2009 again in 2010 I may not be standing here.  Because we could roll through one year but not through two.“

Even before the drought of 2009, a coalition of California growers and agricultural workers realized a fight over water rights was brewing and formed the Latino Water Coalition.  Ultimately, the group played an integral role in getting a measure through the California legislature to improve the Golden State’s aging water infrastructure.

Manuel Cunha is president of the Nisei Farmers League, a farmer advocacy group based in the San Joaquin Valley. The Nisei Farmers League is a member of the Coalition.

Manuel Cunha, Nisei Farmers League: “…if you don't start now it is going to take 10 to 12 years to do --- review and EIRs, an Environmental Impact Reports and lawsuits and lawsuits and everything else that goes along with that.  But I would hope that other states realize that they can get out in front of this thing ahead with their states rather than waiting until the catastrophes that are occurring in this state. This is the 900 pound gorilla.  …we are continually procrastinating because of politics."

In 2009, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger approved a $14.1 billion measure that included provisions to repair, improve and expand California’s canals and reservoirs. Known as the water bond, the legislation was set to go on the 2010 ballot for approval by the people of California. But lackluster support and an operating budget of over $1 trillion found the governor asking for a delay until 2012.

Over the following two years, water levels rebounded but flow restrictions remained and interest by those living in more urban parts of the state waned.

Currently, reservoirs in California are at 110 percent of normal capacity. But a great deal of the water will never reach California farm fields due to the increased numbers of endangered fish near pumping station intakes. And even if the water were to make it downstream, aging infrastructure and capacity issues would prevent long term storage.

The higher levels were of no help to those Valley farmers who have seen their water allotments slashed by as much as 90 percent. While more water was made available last April it was too little too late.

Joe Del Bosque, Empresas Del Bosque: “You know we make our plans in the fall like in November.  And you know we are - actually preparing ... to plant in the spring by February or March.  We didn't get our first allocation until; I think it was almost April.”

 California Governor Jerry Brown stated to farmers in January of last year he was in favor of dropping the water bond from the ballot to focus on state income and sales tax issues. While failing to take the political hint initially, the California legislature ultimately decided to kick the can down the road to the 2014 ballot.

Despite numerous requests by Market to Market, Governor Brown refused to comment on the issue.

A poll by the nonpartisan think tank Public Policy Institute of California found 51 percent of Californians are in favor of the water bond while 34 percent oppose the measure.

Joe Del Bosque: We farmers have been facing water reductions for 20 years.  So we understand that.  We know what it is like when they turn the tap off to us.  People in Los Angeles and San Diego that have never had the tap turned off.  The day that happens or the day that they open it and a little dribble comes out, it is going to be a disaster.  They will say what happened?  Why didn't somebody do something about this?  But these things don't happen overnight."

For now, Central Valley Farmers can only watch and wait to see if political efforts will open the tap a bit wider.

For Market to Market, I’m David Miller.


Tags: California farmers Latino Water Coalition water bond water shortage


blog comments powered by Disqus

Comment Policy

Iowa Public Television encourages conversation and debate around issues, events and ideas related to program topics.

  • The editorial staff of Iowa Public Television reserves the right to take down comments it deems inappropriate.
  • Profanity, personal attacks, off-topic posts, advertisements and spam will not be tolerated.

Find out more about's privacy policy and terms of use.