Cuban leader Fidel Castro says the $35 million dollars in food contracts signed late last year with U.S. companies were a one-time deal. However, Cuba's president of food import enterprise says his government could buy more American farm products if it receives more encouraging signs from Washington.
The politics of trade could hit a snag there, for any number of reasons. Among them ... surging government subsidies to U..S. farmers that some claim are threatening present and future trade agreements.
While farmes have come to rely on the payments, it now appears they may have put the U.S. at risk of violating international agreements governing trade-distorting subsidies.
Under the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture, the U.S. and other countries agreed to reduce the amount of trade-distorting domestic subsidies given to farmers ... to reduce export subsidies ... and to increase access to foreign-produced goods. To date, the U.S. has honored those commitments. But USDA officials are warning that sharp increases in direct payments in recent years have pushed the U.S. closer to the ceiling allowed under the Uruguay agreement.
To that end, Brazil this week warned U.S. lawmakers that future trade talks cannot take place unless the United States cuts price-distorting subsidies to farmers. Brazil's agriculture minister said his nation is considering filing a formal complaint with the World Trade Organization over U.S. subsidies to its soybean farmers. The Brazilians claim they lose a billion dollars every year because of the subsidies.
Brazil is the world's second-largest soybean producer behind the U.S., but the production gap between the two is closing quickly because of the fast-rising production of low-cost Brazilian beans.